Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cotton Research

Fig. 2

From: Assessing fiber quality variability among modern upland cotton cultivars and incorporating it into the GOSSYM-based fiber quality simulation model

Fig. 2

Simulated and measured values for fiber strength (a), fiber length (b), micronaire (c), and length uniformity index (d). Horizontal dashed lines represent the simulated values ± 2.5% (Sim. +2.5%, Sim. −2.5%), ± 7.5% (Sim. +7.5%, Sim. −7.5%), ± 12.5% (Sim. +12.5%, Sim. −12.5%), ± 17.5% (Sim. +17.5%, Sim. −17.5%), and ± 22.5% (Sim. +22.5%, Sim. −22.5%). RMSE root mean square error, r Pearson correlation coefficient, WIA Willmott's index of agreement

Back to article page

Journal of Cotton Research

ISSN: 2523-3254

Contact us